Kia Ceed 2010 vs Seat Leon 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Leon is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 122 HP less power than Seat Leon, whereas torque is 164 NM less than Seat Leon. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.1 | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Ceed consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Leon, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Ceed is 6 cm shorter than the Seat Leon, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 341 litres | |
| Kia Ceed has 1 litres less trunk space than the Seat Leon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Leon, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Seat Leon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Seat Leon, so Seat Leon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Seat Leon has
| |