Kia Ceed 2010 vs Mazda 3 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 186 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 23 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 24 NM less than Mazda 3. Despite the higher power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.1 | |
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Ceed consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
Kia Ceed is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia Ceed is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Ceed is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 364 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1263 litres | |
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Kia Ceed has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`815 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3800 | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |