Kia Ceed 2010 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Kia Ceed
2010 - 2012
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 143 HP120 HP
Torque: 186 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds8.9 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Kia Ceed engine produces 23 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 24 NM less than Mazda 3. Despite the higher power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.15.1
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia Ceed consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 300 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway1180 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.46 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Kia Ceed is smaller, but slightly higher.
Kia Ceed is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Ceed is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1263 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Kia Ceed has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`815
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 38007800
Pros and Cons: Kia Ceed has
  • more power
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv