Kia Ceed 2010 vs Renault Megane 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.5 | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Ceed consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1300 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Kia Ceed has 28 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Renault Megane has
| |