Kia Ceed 2012 vs Audi A3 2013

 
Kia Ceed
2012 - 2015
Audi A3
2013 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 128 HP105 HP
Torque: 260 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds10.9 seconds
Kia Ceed engine produces 23 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Audi A3. Despite the higher power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.73.8
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Ceed consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1430 km in combined cycle1310 km in combined cycle
1510 km on highway1510 km on highway
920 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.31 m4.31 m
Width: 1.78 m1.79 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
Kia Ceed and Audi A3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1318 litres1220 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8101`820
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 580011 000
Pros and Cons: Kia Ceed has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv