Kia Ceed 2013 vs Hyundai i30 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 78 HP more power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 108 NM more than Hyundai i30. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 250'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2011 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Ceed is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Ceed is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1318 litres | 1250 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Kia Ceed has 40 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 68 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Kia Ceed can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |