Kia Ceed 2015 vs Ford Focus 2014
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 171 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Ford Focus. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Focus engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20, Hyundai Kona | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford C-Max, Ford Fiesta, Ford Tourneo, Ford B-Max | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Kia Ceed engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.51 m | |
Kia Ceed is smaller. Kia Ceed is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 490 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | 1502 litres | |
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 38 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The Ford Focus may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 140 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 7600 | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Ford Focus has
| |