Kia Ceed 2012 vs Mazda 3 2011

 
Kia Ceed
2012 - 2013
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP115 HP
Torque: 220 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.5 seconds11 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Kia Ceed engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.34.3
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1230 km in combined cycle1270 km in combined cycle
1390 km on highway1440 km on highway
960 km with real consumption1010 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.31 m4.46 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Kia Ceed is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1318 litres1360 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 42 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9101`830
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 54005000
Pros and Cons: Kia Ceed has
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv