Kia Ceed 2015 vs Fiat Stilo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 32 HP more power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Fiat Stilo. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | Used also on Fiat Doblo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Fiat Stilo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.57 m | |
| Kia Ceed is 2 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.1 metres more than that of the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |