Kia Ceed 2015 vs Volkswagen Golf 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 54 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 220 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Ceed is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 380 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`181 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |