Kia Ceed 2015 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 20 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, but torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Rapid. Despite the higher power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is larger. Kia Ceed and Skoda Rapid are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 415 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Kia Ceed has 35 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`181 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Rapid has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Ceed, so Skoda Rapid quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |