Kia Ceed 2012 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
| Kia Ceed 2012 engine produces 10 HP more power than Kia Ceed 2009, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Kia Ceed 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed 2012 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed 2012 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2012 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Kia Ceed 2012 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.53 m | |
| Kia Ceed 2012 is 2 cm longer than the Kia Ceed 2009, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed 2012 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | 1664 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Ceed 2012 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed 2009. This could mean that the Kia Ceed 2012 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed 2009 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed 2012 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed 2009. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |