Kia Ceed 2007 vs Mazda 3 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 143 HP | 105 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 186 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 11.6 seconds | 6.1 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.6 | 4.4 - 9.6 | |
|
Kia Ceed petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia Ceed is 22 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Kia Ceed has 141 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |