Kia Ceed 2007 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kia Ceed is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Alfa Romeo MiTo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 143 HP | 78 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 186 NM | 120 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 11.6 seconds | 7.5 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.6 | 4.3 - 6.5 | |
|
Kia Ceed petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo MiTo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is larger. Kia Ceed is 19 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 950 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Kia Ceed has 70 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`629 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |