Kia Ceed 2010 vs Renault Clio 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 143 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 255 NM | 93 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 14.1 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.6 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
On average, the Kia Ceed petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Renault Clio. On average, Kia Ceed equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is larger. Kia Ceed is 45 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 15 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Ceed has 170 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Kia Ceed uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`803 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Clio has
| |