Kia Ceed 2010 vs Citroen C4 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 143 HP | 92 - 156 HP | |
Torque: | 137 - 255 NM | 135 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 14.1 seconds | 8.6 - 12.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.6 | 3.7 - 6.9 | |
Kia Ceed petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4. On average, Kia Ceed equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Ceed is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1183 litres | |
Citroen C4 has more luggage space. Kia Ceed has 40 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.9 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`803 | ~ 1`806 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |