Kia Ceed 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 143 HP | 90 - 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 304 NM | 137 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 14 seconds | 10.2 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.6 | 4.2 - 6.6 | |
|
Kia Ceed 2009 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed 2012. On average, Kia Ceed 2009 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.49 m | |
| Kia Ceed 2009 is 2 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed 2012, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed 2009 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1642 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed 2009 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed 2012. The Kia Ceed 2012 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed 2009 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed 2009 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`888 | ~ 1`877 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |