Kia Ceed 2012 vs Kia Ceed 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 135 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 260 NM | 137 - 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 13.9 seconds | 10.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.6 | 4.5 - 7.6 | |
|
Kia Ceed 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed 2009. On average, Kia Ceed 2012 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.53 m | |
| Kia Ceed 2012 is 2 cm longer than the Kia Ceed 2009, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed 2012 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | 1664 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Ceed 2012 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed 2009. This could mean that the Kia Ceed 2012 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed 2009 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed 2012 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed 2009. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`877 | ~ 1`888 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |