Kia Ceed 2010 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 143 HP | 100 - 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 304 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.1 seconds | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.6 | 4.1 - 7.6 | |
|
Kia Ceed petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Kia Ceed equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Kia Ceed is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Ceed is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1300 litres | 1263 litres | |
| Kia Ceed has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 37 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`772 | ~ 1`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |