Kia Ceed 2012 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 265 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 13.5 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 7.6 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
|
Kia Ceed petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Kia Ceed equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia Ceed is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1318 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`860 | ~ 1`976 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |