Kia Ceed 2012 vs Volvo C30 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 265 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 13.5 seconds | 6.7 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 7.6 | 4.5 - 9.0 | |
|
Kia Ceed petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C30. On average, Kia Ceed equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Ceed is 4 cm longer than the Volvo C30, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Ceed is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1318 litres | 921 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Kia Ceed has 129 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 397 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo C30, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`860 | ~ 1`848 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |