Kia Ceed 2012 vs Mazda 3 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 105 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 265 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 13.5 seconds | 6.1 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 7.6 | 4.3 - 9.6 | |
|
Kia Ceed petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Kia Ceed equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia Ceed is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1318 litres | 1360 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Kia Ceed has 101 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 42 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`860 | ~ 1`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |