Kia Ceed 2015 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 300 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.8 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Kia Ceed petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Kia Ceed equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Ceed is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1318 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 182 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`849 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |