Kia Ceed 2015 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 300 NM | 150 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.8 | 3.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Kia Ceed petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Kia Ceed equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia Ceed is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Ceed is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1318 litres | 1334 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`849 | ~ 1`857 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |