Kia Carnival 2002 vs Kia Carnival 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Kia Carnival 2002 engine produces 41 HP less power than Kia Carnival 2006, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Kia Carnival 2006. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Carnival 2002 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Carnival 2002 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Carnival 2002 could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Carnival 2002 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 18 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Kia Carnival 2002 is 12 cm longer than the Kia Carnival 2006, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival 2002 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1666 litres | |
|
Kia Carnival 2006 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Carnival 2002 has 62 litres less trunk space than the Kia Carnival 2006. This could mean that the Kia Carnival 2002 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival 2002 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Kia Carnival 2006, which means Kia Carnival 2002 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |