Kia Carnival 2002 vs Hyundai H1 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Hyundai H1 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Carnival engine produces 4 HP more power than Hyundai H1, but torque is 4 NM less than Hyundai H1. Despite the higher power, Kia Carnival reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Carnival consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Kia Carnival over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Carnival consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Carnival) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.97 m | |
| Kia Carnival is 11 cm shorter than the Hyundai H1, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |