Kia Carnival 2002 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 5 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Kia Carnival consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Carnival could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Carnival consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Kia Carnival is 12 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chrysler Voyager has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Carnival has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Chrysler Voyager, so Chrysler Voyager quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |