Kia Carnival 2002 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Kia Carnival engine produces 5 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Kia Carnival reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Carnival consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Carnival could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Carnival consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is smaller. Kia Carnival is 18 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 618 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |