Kia Carnival 2002 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 3 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Despite the higher power, Kia Carnival reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.1 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Carnival consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Carnival could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Rover 75, Rover 400 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is smaller. Kia Carnival is 18 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3320 litres | 4130 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 618 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 810 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`555 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |