Kia Carnival 2002 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Kia Carnival engine produces 6 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 51 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Kia Carnival reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 13.3 | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Carnival consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Kia Carnival over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Rover 75, Rover 400 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is smaller. Kia Carnival is 15 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3320 litres | 4880 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 369 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1560 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`555 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |