Kia Carnival 2002 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 3 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Despite the higher power, Kia Carnival reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 12.0 | |
| Kia Carnival consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Carnival could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Rover 75, Rover 400 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is smaller. Kia Carnival is 18 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 618 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`555 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |