Kia Carnival 2002 vs Chrysler Town & Country 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Town & Country is a more dynamic driving. Kia Carnival engine produces 68 HP less power than Chrysler Town & Country, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Chrysler Town & Country. Due to the lower power, Kia Carnival reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 11.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Town & Country is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Carnival consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Town & Country, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Carnival could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Town & Country gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is smaller. Kia Carnival is 17 cm shorter than the Chrysler Town & Country, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 566 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 566 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 302 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4754 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`555 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Town & Country has
| |