Kia Carnival 2006 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 22 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Carnival consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Carnival could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Carnival consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Kia Carnival and Ford Galaxy are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1666 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 26 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`920 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |