Kia Carnival 2006 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 36 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, but torque is 17 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Carnival consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Kia Carnival over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Carnival consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Kia Carnival and Chrysler Voyager are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1666 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`920 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chrysler Voyager has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Carnival has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Chrysler Voyager, so Chrysler Voyager quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |