Kia Carnival 2006 vs Nissan Primastar 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 343 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
Kia Carnival engine produces 70 HP more power than Nissan Primastar, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Nissan Primastar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.5 | |
Kia Carnival consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primastar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Carnival could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
Nissan Primastar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.98 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.94 m | |
Kia Carnival is larger, but lower. Kia Carnival is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Primastar, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 2150 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1666 litres | no data | |
Nissan Primastar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Carnival has 1786 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Primastar. This could mean that the Kia Carnival uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Primastar. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`920 | 2`790 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Nissan Primastar has
| |