Kia Carnival 2006 vs Hyundai H1 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 86 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Hyundai H1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 65 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Carnival) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is larger, but lower. Kia Carnival is 12 cm longer than the Hyundai H1, 16 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1666 litres | 3295 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`920 | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |