Kia Carnival 2006 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 189 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 28 HP more power than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.72 m | |
| Kia Carnival is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 13 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1666 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 26 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`765 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Carnival has serious deffects in 375 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |