Kia Carnival 2006 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 189 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 42 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 31 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.1 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Carnival consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Carnival could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Kia Carnival and Chrysler Voyager are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1666 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 76 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`765 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chrysler Voyager has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Carnival has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Chrysler Voyager, so Chrysler Voyager quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |