Kia Carnival 2006 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 189 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 249 NM | 217 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
Kia Carnival engine produces 24 HP more power than Mitsubishi Grandis, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Mitsubishi Grandis. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.4 | |
The Mitsubishi Grandis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Carnival consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Carnival could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.98 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.66 m | |
Kia Carnival is larger. Kia Carnival is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Grandis, 18 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 16 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 320 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 320 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 364 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1666 litres | 1545 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Carnival (by 121 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Grandis, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`765 | 2`250 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Mitsubishi Grandis has
| |