Kia Carnival 2014 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 50 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Carnival 2014 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Kia Carnival 2014 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.12 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Kia Carnival is 2 cm longer than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 359 litres | 748 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2335 litres | 4550 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Kia Carnival uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2215 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 3`045 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |