Kia Carnival 2001 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 149 HP | |
Torque: | 324 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Kia Carnival engine produces 19 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.93 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
Kia Carnival is 12 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Chrysler Voyager has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Carnival has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Chrysler Voyager, so Chrysler Voyager quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |