Kia Carnival 2001 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 324 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 19 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is smaller. Kia Carnival is 18 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 4130 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 618 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`550 kg | 2`630 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`865 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 685 kg | 600 kg | |
| Kia Carnival load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Therefore, Kia Carnival is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |