Kia Carnival 2001 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.5 - 2.9 | 2.4 - 3.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 - 150 HP | 140 - 180 HP | |
Torque: | 224 - 324 NM | 218 - 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 - 16.4 seconds | 11.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 12.4 | 7.7 - 12.7 | |
Kia Carnival petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Voyager. On average, Kia Carnival equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.93 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
Kia Carnival is 12 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3320 litres | no data | |
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Carnival has 138 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Voyager. This could mean that the Kia Carnival uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`590 | ~ 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |