Kia Carnival 2001 vs Mazda MPV 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Kia Carnival is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mazda MPV is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 2.5 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 - 150 HP | 136 - 141 HP | |
Torque: | 224 - 324 NM | 195 - 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 - 16.4 seconds | 12.7 - 13.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 12.4 | 7.1 - 10.1 | |
Kia Carnival petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda MPV. On average, Kia Carnival equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.93 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
Kia Carnival is larger, but lower. Kia Carnival is 13 cm longer than the Mazda MPV, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 294 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3320 litres | 2745 litres | |
Kia Carnival has 8 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MPV. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Carnival (by 575 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mazda MPV, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`590 | ~ 2`333 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |