Kia Carnival 2001 vs Kia Carens 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.5 - 2.9 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 - 150 HP | 105 - 138 HP | |
Torque: | 224 - 324 NM | 141 - 245 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 - 16.4 seconds | 10.6 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 12.4 | 7.0 - 9.1 | |
Kia Carnival petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Carens. On average, Kia Carnival equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.93 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.61 m | |
Kia Carnival is larger. Kia Carnival is 44 cm longer than the Kia Carens, 15 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 422 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3320 litres | 1632 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Kia Carnival has 120 litres less trunk space than the Kia Carens. This could mean that the Kia Carnival uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Carnival (by 1688 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 2.4 metres more than that of the Kia Carens, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`590 | ~ 1`906 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Carens has
| |