Kia Carnival 2006 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 - 189 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 - 343 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.9 | 6.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Kia Carnival petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Kia Carnival equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.72 m | |
| Kia Carnival is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 13 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1666 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 26 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`843 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |