Kia Carnival 2006 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 - 189 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 - 343 NM | 217 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.9 | 6.6 - 10.0 | |
|
Kia Carnival petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Grandis. On average, Kia Carnival equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is larger. Kia Carnival is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Grandis, 18 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1666 litres | 1545 litres | |
|
Kia Carnival has more luggage capacity. Kia Carnival has 44 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Grandis. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Carnival (by 121 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Grandis, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`843 | ~ 2`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Mitsubishi Grandis has
| |