Kia Carnival 2006 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 2.9 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 - 189 HP | 110 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 - 343 NM | 170 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.9 | 5.7 - 8.9 | |
|
Kia Carnival petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Kia Carnival equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is larger. Kia Carnival is 34 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 15 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1666 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Carnival has 136 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This could mean that the Kia Carnival uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`843 | ~ 1`426 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |