Kia Carnival 2014 vs Nissan Primastar 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.3 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 - 270 HP | 90 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 - 440 NM | 260 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 13.6 seconds | 15.1 - 19 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 11.1 | 7.5 | |
|
On average, Kia Carnival equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primastar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.12 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is larger, but lower. Kia Carnival is 33 cm longer than the Nissan Primastar, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 359 litres | 2150 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2335 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Primastar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Carnival has 1791 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Primastar. This could mean that the Kia Carnival uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Primastar, which means Kia Carnival can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`018 | ~ 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Nissan Primastar has
| |