Kia Carens 2016 vs Ford C-Max 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 166 HP | 85 - 185 HP | |
Torque: | 164 - 260 NM | 141 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 13.2 seconds | 8.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.8 | 3.8 - 6.5 | |
Kia Carens petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Kia Carens equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.63 m | |
Kia Carens is 15 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carens is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 536 litres | 544 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1650 litres | 1684 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Kia Carens has 8 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. This could mean that the Kia Carens uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 34 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Carens is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`155 | ~ 1`949 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 9600 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carens has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |