Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 199 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 84 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 765 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 7.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 410 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Pacifica | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.66 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 5 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1372 litres | |
|
Opel Mokka has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 215 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.1 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`268 | 1`764 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |